Saturday, March 22, 2014

Friday, March 14, 2014

Magic: the Gathering on ESPN again?

"The last time M:tG was on ESPN, it went poorly, due to a couple facts:
  1. The technology wasn't there, so the cards were barely visible. Watch this clip:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DECaN66tm0k[1] . It's Finkel v. Maher, one of the most exciting games ever played. It was barely watchable for me because I didn't know any of the cards because I didn't play during that time, and couldn't make them out in the video. I even knew the rules-imagine someone who doesn't.
  2. This was on ESPN2, on TV, which I don't think is the best medium for a niche game like M:tG. Magic players have always been on the forefront of utilizing the internet as a means to better access this game that we all love, and streaming basically goes hand in hand with that. Also, if you're watching a game on a stream, all you need is to hear the name of the card and you can gatherer it, and you have something to do in during the downtime in between rounds/shuffling.
M:tG is more popular now than ever before. The barrier to entry to M:tG is probably equal to that of poker, which is on ESPN all the time. ESPN recently launched their new streaming service, Watch ESPN. I think this has a ton of potential.
I think it'd be really interesting to see M:tG on ESPN again, and a great time to evaluate whether or not this relationship can work is during this upcoming week's world championship. This potentially could work for both parties (Wizards gets advertising, ESPN gets a ton of young viewers on Watch ESPN). Also, I think ESPN can really push the technology such that pro M:tG becomes even more popular and watchable (like being able to hover your mouse over the card and have the oracle text pop up in real time).
Full Disclosure: I'm a Production Assistant for ESPN, and I'm basically guaging interest to see if this is worth pitching to my superiors.
Thanks for your time and responses.
EDIT 1: Woah did not expect this kind of response. I'll do my best to find out what kind of #'s Watch ESPN gets, and what kind of numbers Twitch gets. If I do pitch this, I'll be sure to do so by letting my bosses know: MtG'ers aren't going to pay for online streaming because WOTC already produces a very good stream for free. If they were goingto produce a stream, it'd have to be better than the one WOTC or SCG already produces. I'll also let tehm know that M:tGer's are willing to watch ads if they are being provided with a free stream, and that there's a group among those who willing to pay so that they don't have to watch ads. I don't think this pitch is going to be for a little while (I just started about two weeks ago) but I'm excited to have so many different voices and ideas available here. Thanks guys."



]irn0rchid 799 points  ago (929|130)
If you could generate a stream that would actually show a high quality digital representation of the game state along with the live feed, like how poker shows the hands of the players, then that would be something I would watch.

[–]7idledays 235 points  ago (279|44)
Yes. The potential is limitless if ESPN actually wanted to put money and effort into making a good stream.
[–]FrndlyMisanthrpe 91 points  ago (108|17)
Well, like... isn't the infrastructure already there if Poker tourneys use that system? It's not like they'd have to develop it from scratch.
[–]Falterfire 80 points  ago (92|12)
It's a lot easier to represent 3♥ than it is to show all of Thragtusk.
[–]FrndlyMisanthrpe 26 points  ago (31|5)
Well, if we're going for something akin to competitive televised sports, they could show the art, and any effects and its p/t in a translucent overlay.
Furthermore, it isn't as if they need to show it all the time; the commentators would be able to bring up what's relevant at present, such as what's triggering what, what's on the stack, yada yada yada.
[–]Tehkorr 13 points  ago (17|4)
Hell they could have a visual stack that updates as players cast spells and such. And a phase marker (though that could get hairy)
[–]Quicksilver_Johny 2 points  ago (2|0)
Yeah, this isn't MTGO. Shortcuts and out of order sequences means phases and objects on the stack move very quickly and not that predictably.
[–]Griffsnog 8 points  ago (13|5)
Everybody knows what Thragtusk is though. It's a creature and I can kill it with fire! (I play a lot of red).
[–]Homeschooled316 29 points  ago (39|10)
I hope you carry two spears
[–]razzliox 6 points  ago (8|2)
I don't know if you watch streamed Magic, but Starcitygames's solution was pretty elegant. They just brought up the card and shifted the normally centered game to the right/left.
[–]7idledays 38 points  ago (44|6)
Exactly, especially if they can have the board and hands represented on screen in a readable manner
[–]ItsDanimal 107 points  ago (127|20)
When they do deck registrations, the ESPN folks can make sure they have the card images for all the cards in the decks. I'd imagine it would take a lot of time for them to go through and do every card, but maybe I'm wrong.
Think of how cool it would be for them to be show to toss up stats. "ItsDanimal is against the ropes, his opponent has lethal on board. He has a 10% chance to top deck one of these 3 cards in his deck. He untaps, OMG he got the XXXXX!!!!! He is back in the game."
The crowd goes wild, I go on to win Pro Tour XXX, TCGPlayer goes on to give me my own column... wait, what were we talking about?
EDIT I get that it won't be hard for them to get cards into a program.
[–]thecravenone 35 points  ago (41|6)
I'd imagine it would take a lot of time for them to go through and do every card, but maybe I'm wrong.
Seems easy for constructed. Everyone submits a decklist electronically. Anything not done electronically could be done via OCR (we're talking about freaking Disney - they have the power!)
[–]memnoc 17 points  ago (18|1)
It's not as difficult as one might think. To be modest or realistic here: an amateur programmer (me or anyone else who knows slightly what they're doing) can make a script which takes a list of names and rips the images individually from a site like magiccards.info which has the images in high quality in real-time.
Whoever would design the overlay could have an active list of card names in text and then just assign locations on the screen.
No need to scan. No need to worry about deck checks for the visual department, but only for the judges to make sure people are playing legally which already occurs.
[–]cloned64 6 points  ago (7|1)
Not really, just have them fill it out on a computer, the computer finds the cards from a database and you are done. You do need some error correction people in case there is a typo but it is still pretty fast.
[–]TCGSilverheart 1 point  ago (1|0)
It really would not take a lot of time/effort at all. The constructed (actually played by good decks on pro events) card pool in a format, especially standard, is actually very small.
[–]Glitch29 7 points  ago (7|0)
For these purposes, even the legacy card pool is extremely small. People forget we're in the 21st century. Excel files with 1020 rows can compute in fractions of seconds, and the images are already cataloged electronically on dozens of sites.
[–]TCGSilverheart 3 points  ago (3|0)
Very true as well. I would venture to guess that even the Legacy card pool is only a few hundred cards, even at the pro level.
[–]Avengedx 2 points  ago (3|1)
Yes and no. The equipment and technology is there. The rights, and where they would set up their crews etc, would not be there. For instance, are they and Hasbro going to pay the casinos where these systems are already in place to shut down their tables and event centers on a regular basis? Probably not. That means that they would have to find suitable locations, and begin working with a whole new set of owners in making this happen. You have to look at from an investment standpoint. If there is 10,000,000 players worldwide, and by the way I am guessing the numbers, and they all watch the stream. Going from the numbers I pulled from a couple of streaming sites, it looks like you can make anywhere between $4-6 dollars per thousand views on an ad. If you run say 16 ads in a tournament, and 10,000,000 people watch and see each add in an 8 hour tournament (basically once every 30 minutes), you would be looking at about $40-60,000 in ad revenue. Keep in mind that is if all 10,000,000 people watched the entire 8 hours of a tournament to see every ad. So realistically you are looking at less then $50,000 to be made every event. License to film in an area, paying a production crew, graphics, etc. That does not seem like a ton of money to be made. It would probably take a significant investment to make it happen and be successful. It would also probably require long term commitments with the places that would be hosting the pro tours.
[–]TempletonFisk 40 points  ago (50|10)
WotC kind of did this for Pro Tour Montreal. They had spotters with tablets that updated what each player drew.
Heck, they even tracked what cards were drafted and in what order.
[–]roarmalf 12 points  ago (17|5)
this. the production quality would have to be at least as good as what is already out there, it would be worth needing ESPN if they actually improved on the current broadcast standards.
[–]InSipiDSkY 7 points  ago (8|1)
I think the reason they can do that is that it's tape delayed, not live.
[–]ccdnl1 5 points  ago (8|3)
This. I also like on the current MTG streams where the production pulls up the cards the casters are talking about. Also there is nothing more fun for me than watching Drafts. I f'ing love watching Drafts...
[–]TempletonFisk 212 points  ago (281|69)
"This program is available only to customers of cable providers that offer WatchESPN"
Oooooooooooh! That sounds A LOT better and more accessible than Twitch. Please, please, please, segment and add a media wall to our streams.
[–]WigginIII 105 points  ago (122|17)
Instead of sarcasm we should offer reasons why their policy should be changed.
If ESPN wants to compete with online streaming services, it needs to compete with existing free services. How do you beat free? You offer a higher quality product, incentives, or a combination of both.
Most stream services are ad supported, with a premium service available that eliminates ads. This is a successful business model that ESPN should consider.
However, how does ESPN break into a market that already covers eSports and TCGs so successfully? That will be the task of ESPN to figure out.
About a year ago MLG's Sundance was approached by ESPN for a potential partnership. The key becomes, how does ESPN deliver a quality product. Do they use existing community streamer personalities? Do they use their own in-house commentators? Are these employees contracted? What about the royalties split between Wizards, and ESPN, etc. How much creative control of the broadcast would ESPN have? Would Wizards have any say?
There are a ton of minute details involved in potentially dealing with a major "traditional" broadcaster such as ESPN. I would love to see it, but there would have to be a full commitment by ESPN, delving into TCGs and eSports simultaneously would be key, and delivering a quality product that the community both enjoys and respects will be essential to have any success.
[–]Nullkid 16 points  ago (18|2)
Commentators are a big thing for me... Ufc on fox is horrible when they let their guys read off a paper. It needs to be people that know the game and not five time someone someone that has nothing to do with the scene but fox.
[–]TheProudCanadian 63 points  ago (84|21)
This. Cable TV and anything that requires it is frankly a terribly outdated medium for something like MtG, a game that mostly involves younger people that increasingly consume media via things like Netflix and Youtube, and who I think would be very reluctant to put up cash for the privilege of watching two people play a card game. If it could somehow be done in an accessible way that still had some sort of budget to work with, then sure.
[–]FarplaneDragon 12 points  ago (14|2)
Honestly, as an adult I'd be reluctant to put up cash for the privilege of watching two people play a card game.
[–]Militant_Monk 27 points  ago (36|9)
Yeah why bother we have Twitch. It's far better and we don't have to worry about the network dropping it midseason. :P
[–]irn0rchid 12 points  ago (22|10)
Because they could potentially do it a lot better. "Watching" Twitch isn't much better than just listening to Twitch.
[–]dorvaan 7 points  ago (10|3)
Change the quality to 720p and it looks fantastic in my experience. It defaults to 240p.
[–]irn0rchid 12 points  ago (16|4)
It's not that the quality is bad, it's that there's nothing to see. And it seems to cap out at 480p for me.
[–]bfro 11 points  ago (14|3)
Do you watch the Pro Tour streams or just the SCG open series? Wizards/Hasbro is actively increasing the production quality of the Pro Tour coverage with on screen graphics for the cards the announcers are talking about, on screen indicator of cards in hand, and things like deck techs and personality pieces in between the matches.
Watching Gerard Fabiano and Patrick Sullivan banter about the game while you can barely make out the entire board state can get old, but tune into twitch.tv/magic tomorrow starting at 5am CST to see what Magic coverage has achieved.
[–]irn0rchid 3 points  ago (4|1)
You're correct, most of what I've seen has been SCG stuff. I'll give it a look tomorrow, thanks.
[–]Codeboy3423 1 point  ago (6|5)
I agree.
Now I would watch it on ESPN if and ONLY IF there is no catch to it like above post about only available to cable customers ect.ect. and available to watch online as well as it being on TV. Because if not and those things occurred you will lose a lot of potential viewers for both TV and online.
So if your going to do this thing again...Then do it right! otherwise Twitch.tv is still the better option.
[–]Militant_Monk 2 points  ago (3|1)
Yeah this. I'm sorry if I have to subscribe to cable to watch it then it's not going to happen. If they don't keep archives online for several years at least then it's of limited use as well. Potential is there but it can easily be squandered.
[–]AjarKeen 9 points  ago (10|1)
I'd watch it if I could do so without having cable. I mean, I recently watched the NBA finals on ESPN's Xbox 360 app without needing cable, so why should I need cable to watch MTG?
Take a cue from the eSports scene -- look at how major tournaments are streamed in games like Starcraft 2 or League of Legends. That's the model MTG coverage should be emulating.
[–]priceQQ 1 point  ago (1|0)
League has been using the same production team as other major sports leagues. I think if Magic has equally awesome production, then lots of people will watch
[–]Gaming_Loser 1 point  ago (3|2)
Yep. And if Hasbro makes a deal with ESPN to broadcast. The first thing they will do is send out mass lawyer theats for anyone streaming games of magic. Because they dont want there market splintered and dont like competition. THink it cant happen? Ask all those people who made those Magic apps a few years ago when Wotc decided to try and make there own.
[–]therealsylvos 2 points  ago (2|0)
That's unlikely to happen. It will happen for stuff like the pro tour, but everything else is far too valuable to them and doesn't really have any downside.
[–]cXo_Ironman_dXy 1 point  ago (1|0)
Except the wotc app sucked
[–]GhostofEnlil 185 points  ago (213|28)
I don't watch MtG matches at all but I probably would all the time if it were on ESPN.
[–]WuTrain 75 points  ago (87|12)
I know I'm the same way. If I could just switch on ESPN late at night and watch some mtg I would.
[–]GhostofEnlil 45 points  ago (51|6)
Exactly. I just want to sit on the couch, build a deck and watch some MtG. Who knows, maybe I would finally have interest in playing standard instead of just EDH all the time. It's really a win-win-win situation.
[–]Swampcaster 20 points  ago (22|2)
you can watch twitch almost every night and see mtg being played live or even watch older streams you might have missed
[–]GhostofEnlil 19 points  ago (20|1)
My gf usually wants the computer to play LoL so this would make us both happy :P
[–]papajace 5 points  ago (6|1)
But that's pretty low quality stuff.
[–]Mordechia 2 points  ago (2|0)
is 720p low quality?
[–]Charles-Shaw 4 points  ago (4|0)
Yeah, but the format it's presented in on twitch is not nearly as clean or appealing.
[–]ahoy1 11 points  ago (17|6)
SCG streams matches all the time, and their coverage is great.
[–]Cynoid 2 points  ago (7|5)
Other than this last weekends invitational, most SCG streams the past 2-3 months have been streaming in something like 120-240p. I know every playable card in standard and most of the time it is still impossible to tell what half the cards are....(settings are at 720+ of course but it still looks like crap if scg uploads it that way)
[–]TempletonFisk 3 points  ago (3|0)
It has been crystal clear for me. Are you using a public network that is throttled?
[–]Skooter_McGaven 2 points  ago (2|0)
I stream it on my phone every weekend in HD no problem
[–]Cynoid 3 points  ago (5|2)
I think you could stream coverage from a potato to a 4in screen and have it look great :)
[–]Skooter_McGaven 1 point  ago (1|0)
Fair point....looks great on the phone tho
[–]ahoy1 1 point  ago (1|0)
Ah, that's what I get for not paying attention. I'll admit I never just watch SCG streams. It's always on in the background at my LGS, I just sort of hear the commentary.
[–]Tosus 5 points  ago (5|0)
I don't watch ESPN at all, but I probably would if it had Magic.
[–]Farsho 1 point  ago (5|4)
Me too, I can stream live from the Internet, so this would be great!!
[–]TempletonFisk 3 points  ago (6|3)
You can watch streams live now.
[–]Angoth 6 points  ago (6|0)
You're confusing him.
[–]Farsho 4 points  ago (4|0)
I meant can't, my bad
[–]Dangevin 145 points  ago (177|32)
My sole concern is to have commentators who are both knowledgeable and interested in Magic. Repackaging your sportscasters or poker color commentators will not work - you will need to have a mix of M:TG writers, pros and podcasters. Don't worry, we work for cheap.
Barring that, you could broadcast a black screen and I would tune in. More than 80% of the M:TG content I consume is in podcast form, which I listen to during my commute. If you could harness that love and energy into a visual format, even with the "low tech" you mentioned from the old ESPN2 broadcasts, I would be a watcher in prime time.
I would always rather play a game, than watch other people play. To sell me, add value to simply watching - and I don't mean Hi-Def so you can read the cards - I can see what my friends are playing at the kitchen table. I need a guide - someone who can talk out their thought processes as they sit there with their hand on their head for minutes. Give me insight.
Also, stealing from poker - you need a hand-cam. One thing lacking from almost all M:TG event coverage is that omniscience of knowing what the "hole cards" are. Arguably, watching a match and not knowing what the players' cards-in-hand are can offer benefits to viewers looking to learn, but I will always argue that the more information, the better - and let the viewer decide what is useful.
[–]bfro 22 points  ago (24|2)
The official WOTC coverage of events like the pro tour has finally included all of the cards in a players hand. I have seen table reporters tap a player on the shoulder and ask them to reveal the card they have just drawn so they can get it up to the booth.
[–]Draffut_ 17 points  ago (24|7)
I need a guide - someone who can talk out their thought processes as they sit there with their hand on their head for minutes. Give me insight.
This is why I love MTG tournies on Twitch.
MTG has some great casters and a few not so great, but I only remember being dissappointed once or twice.
LSV is commentating the Worlds this week and that makes me excited.
[–]Touch_Of_Red 89 points  ago (108|19)
The barrier to entry to M:tG is probably equal to that of poker, which is on ESPN all the time.
That's not even close to correct. The basics of poker are understood by most anyone watching TV, and even if someone is brand brand new to it, you can explain to them hand rankings and chip values in about 2 minutes. You know the splash screen with "rules of the game" or "how to play texas hold em" at the beginning of every ep? That's all that's really needed to get someone into the program. There are a massive amount of people just in the demo that have no clue how to play Magic, and probably have never really heard of it before. It would take 10 minutes of one-on-one education just to have them understand what lands do.
But, I think having more magic on TV/internet is a good thing.
[–]ebinsugewa 37 points  ago (40|3)
This is really a big hangup. Even if someone is not a poker aficionado, the average American has seen/played poker at least once in their lives, and has some idea what the objective is. Saying that Magic's ease of watching/learning is comparable is absolutely ludicrous. Poker is an objectively simpler game, and also has the added allure of "winning money/Vegas/whatever" that Magic does not have. Someone is much more likely to watch someone "maybe win a couple million dollars" even if they don't understand what's going on too well, rather than some "nerdy D&D game played by smelly people" regardless of the truth of the respective statements.
[–]OutlawJoseyWales 8 points  ago (9|1)
Don't try to dispute the smelly people thing. There are some fucking stank ass bitches
[–]crackzombie661 2 points  ago (4|2)
For a long time I wasn't into basketball but then I took the time to watch and learn the rules. Now I love watching it and enjoy playing every so often. I believe the more exposure people have to the game the more popular it will become to new fans.
[–]refuse_radar 7 points  ago (7|0)
Can't emphasize this enough. Sure, most of the initial demographic would likely be preexisting mtg fans and players but the increased exposure from a well produced ESPN broadcast would definitely introduce more people to the game and help it grow. I hope ESPN gives this idea a green light.
Checking twitch.tv at the moment shows about 4k stream viewers for magic currently and there aren't even any major tournaments going on atm. That's just viewers for a couple random streamers playing on mtgo. That base is guaranteed to grow if a major player like ESPN steps up and does this right.
[–]sammythemc 2 points  ago (2|0)
I had a similar experience with baseball. I played some little league as a kid, but stopped when I was about 13. I never really watched baseball again until I was in college. My roommate was into baseball, so I would watch games with him and figured out the ins and outs of the rules from the broadcasters. I still keep up on scores and which teams are good and watch a game pretty much every night.
The thing is, I've found it difficult to have the same experience with Magic. I was a casual player who stopped around 8th Edition, and I've recently tried getting back in the swing of things by watching broadcasts. Despite knowing the basic mechanics and understanding the game at a pretty high level back in the day, I have been and still am pretty lost in the weeds. With baseball, I had to wrap my head around some mostly self-explanatory jargon, and then I had to think how the game was different in the majors than in little league, e.g. L/R matchups, closers, the reliability of outs on pop flies, etc. With Magic, I need to do that plus pick up new rules ("What's 'planeswalkers,' precious?!?"), understand what each specific card is doing what within those new rules, and then understand how those cards interact with the current environment. It's pretty daunting.
[–]crackzombie661 3 points  ago (3|0)
I've only seen a couple broadcast and they do tend to use language that is more tuned to the more experienced players. They would definitely need to have an announcer that is able to dumb down to lingo for novice players but not insult the intelligence of the experienced crowd.
[–]DrunkmanDoodoo 1 point  ago (3|2)
They could do an hour long show to introduce people to magic and host it somewhere and ask people who do not understand to take a look at the introductory video.
But that may be asking too much from people.
[–]snowdrifts 5 points  ago (6|1)
And you'd have to replay it a couple times a month, just in case anyone new ever watched.
[–]SimTheGeezer 52 points  ago (67|15)
Right after dodgeball on ESPN 8 "The Ocho"
[–]sammythemc 10 points  ago (14|4)
As with most Dodgeball quotes, there's a good point baked in there. I could definitely see them starting to show stuff like TableTop and gaming championships on ESPN sister networks. Even outside of the cadre of hardcore fans who would initially seek it out, as we've seen with poker, those satellite networks have the power to develop game broadcasts into a more financially viable product than they were. I mean, I've watched snooker on one of those channels. It's not Magic vs Major League Baseball, it's Magic vs beery-faced Englishmen throwing darts.
There are a few problems with figuring out how to introduce people to the game in a broadcast, but let's not over-exaggerate the ratings ESPN3 is getting for its 2 AM timeslot.
[–]chuckiefresh4 33 points  ago (43|10)
More than anything else, MTG needs a "hole cam." Don't even consider it unless you can provide one.
[–]MrBody42 7 points  ago (11|4)
Sounds dirty ;)
[–]Trymantha 4 points  ago (5|1)
the pro tours have started doing something similar, where they have people dedicated to keeping track of whats in the players hand.
[–]branewalker 33 points  ago (37|4)
I'd love to see what professionals could do to MTG coverage. The numbers currently indicate this is a very under-served market.
There is a problem, however. Let's see if I can illustrate.
OP:
Magic players have always been on the forefront of utilizing the internet as a means to better access this game that we all love, and streaming basically goes hand in hand with that.
ESPN's website:
Programs on ESPN require you to sign-in with your TV provider.
Magic players ... on the forefront of utilizing the internet:
What's TV?
So, the coverage needs to be accessible to anyone with an Internet connection. Support it with ads, or make it PPV (LGSs or nerdy/hipster "sports" bars are also possible sources of revenue.)
If you wall this off like Game of Thrones, people who want to watch it aren't going to be able to do so (legally).
[–]HaplessMagician 28 points  ago (43|15)
Um, I dont' have the numbers in front of me, but the maximum viewers I've ever seen was like 20k. If ESPN picks up magic with those numbers, someone will get fired.
[–][deleted] 8 points  ago (15|7)
Yeah, it would have to be on a third rate channel or in a crappy time slot. Maybe ESPN2 or something like that.
I think the fan base has grown but I don't know if its enough to merit television exposure. Also if those numbers are based of Nielsen Ratings it's not entirely accurate.
[–]deilan 15 points  ago (24|9)
If by those numbers you mean the 20k he threw out, he is most likely refering to a SCG or similar twitch stream viewer count. Considering LoL streamers alone can get in the 100ks and LCS or other big tournaments get even more viewers, Magic is probably a really low man on the totem pole.
[–]HaplessMagician 5 points  ago (6|1)
I'm talking about streaming numbers. Twitch TV has the number of current viewers.
[–][deleted] 2 points  ago (6|4)
Oh. So 20k viewers on a Twitch channel? That actually seems pretty good.
[–]winterbean 5 points  ago (10|5)
It's good for a channel, but some League of Legends streamers get that on a daily basis, and the LCS (tournament play) gets close to 200k on big days.
[–]HaplessMagician 3 points  ago (6|3)
Yes, but good for twitch isn't good for ESPN. Also I've seen LoL players get that on a weekday, so it's not that great.
[–][deleted] 5 points  ago (6|1)
right, but not everyone knows about twitch. and its not all that easy to tune in on a computer. its a lot more convenient to be on TV. especially if its advertised. i never remember when tournaments are streaming. but i always know when the 49er games are on TV.
[–]HaplessMagician 8 points  ago (11|3)
Some general points that makes me this this isn't a good idea:
  • Young adults are the demographic with the lowest percentage with cable
  • Streaming TV is far more popular amung young adults
  • Streaming content is on the rise
  • Cable is on the decline
  • MTG would get an awful time slot
[–][deleted] 1 point  ago (1|0)
those are all extremely good points. i agree with those understandings but other then common sense do you have any sources for that info?
[–]HaplessMagician 1 point  ago (1|0)
Nothing on hand, That was all from stuff I have read (probably from TIL articles) in the past few years.
[–][deleted] 1 point  ago (1|0)
yeah, i sort of "know" those things too, but just thought you might have had something you read recently to refer to. no worries.
[–]FalconHunter 3 points  ago (4|1)
I'm willing to wager that you don't have access to NSI cable data.
Trust me - actual viewers (as opposed to splash viewership from public broadcast in businesses) for ESPN2 or ESPN3 in the slots where they would air Magic would KILL for 20k actual viewers.
[–]HaplessMagician 3 points  ago (5|2)
in the slots where they would air Magic
We're talking about prime time... Like 5-8pm they are peaking at 20k. They sure as hell aren't getting that at 4am on a tuesday.
[–]kuaggie 1 point  ago (1|0)
Correct, but I didn't seriously play poker before I saw it on ESPN. I think the community is large enough to support it, and the small number of viewers has been a product of the coverage (I think it needs to be made more beginner friendly), and twitch not being the most mainstream of mediums.
All that said, a venture into LoL would probably be much more profitable than MtG, as sad as I am to say it
[–]sirolimusland 15 points  ago (23|8)
Small correction-
The entry barrier to Magic is higher than poker. Most people understand the basics of poker intuitively (values, bets, bluffs, etc.) they might not get positioning, pot-odds or shifting betting patterns, but they get the gist. They also only need to know 52 cards, compared to the roughly 100 very different cards played in Standard at any given time (sometimes with alternate art from past sets).
[–]enigmazero 5 points  ago (7|2)
I think it's a question of barrier to entry for watching, enjoying and understand a game vs. barrier to entry for playing.
Poker is an easy game to watch because the basic rules are so simple. It's still an incredibly difficult game to play and consistently do well in, but even people who have never played poker before know what a deck of cards is, know what the names of each card are, and probably have some vague idea of hand rankings. They only have to learn about betting structure, blinds and things like that to understand what's going on. It's a game with universal appeal and is considered an American pastime. There's also a huge amount of money involved, so it's very exciting.
Magic, on the other hand, requires a lot of knowledge to even have a clue what's going on in a game. To make it suitable for TV would require a lot of hand holding from the announcers, and they wouldn't have as much time for in depth analysis as they do on the streams we have today. Magic has a stigma of being considered nerdy, people won't want to take the time to learn about it, and the amount of money involved is far lower. I'd love super high quality magic coverage but I just can't see how it would be possible for ESPN.
[–]Demppa 12 points  ago (25|13)
There are so many quality online streams nowadays that I don't think it would be very necessary or successful.
[–]centira 12 points  ago (16|4)
So you're saying to not even bother? Doesn't this subreddit and other various Magic sites always bash the state of MTG streaming? Poor commentators, terrible players, bad video production? Maybe if ESPN got their chance it wouldn't be so bad.
[–]TheSystem_IsDown 3 points  ago (6|3)
You mean... one official stream and a bunch of people streaming their desktops with MTGO?
[–]vednar 12 points  ago (14|2)
I think the online feed should be interactive in a way that allows us to see all the cards in their deck when they are known. So when the announcer says, "He just played a Lilly", whenever we want, we can scroll over lily on the sidebar and see what it is.
When I first started I didn't know what many cards were and after they took them off screen I would have no clue when he would be like, he +1 liliy or -2'd her. I think we are at a point of technology where if the match was on T.V they could send us to a link online where we could do this.
[–]xelajohn 9 points  ago (12|3)
There are very simple ways to make this a good idea. First, get some commentators that are likable, know about the game, and can really comment on the game state. While you want some card and deck assessment, make sure to have them be appealing. And when I mean appealing, I mean to the three main viewer types. People who know basically nothing about the game, intermediate players, and those who have Magic down to a lifestyle. Explain how some of the game works to people just tuning, but don't have them be a how to play video. Let them discuss what makes these decks successful for intermediates. And for the pros, just have them discuss the playstyles we're seeing. Note: This will be the most difficult out of my three suggestions.
Secondly, make sure in your stream to have a chat box along with what you said about the card oracle. And also allow for each pile and card to be scrolled over and seen.(Excluding the deck of course. Unless you wanted to give people a "remaining cards in deck" list. That would be cool.)
Last, screw what cable company they have. EVERYONE should be able to see it. For free. You can still play an ad before the stream starts for the viewer, so not much would be lost.
Do that, I assure you I'll tune in. (Allow live phone calls with minor screening and I'll tell my friends.)
[–]themast 8 points  ago (10|2)
I think the biggest improvement for MTG casting will be a digital representation of the board:
  • can step backwards and forwards through turns to see what you missed
  • can stop to examine board states to get a deeper understanding of the game
  • can see what every card is, full text, etc.
Basically, you need a Cockatrice style board to exist side by side withthe video feed so that the depth of information can be properly presented. This could be maintained by the person at the table who is already doing play by play text coverage, they just need a good interface that links up to the server, which is then displaying it to viewers. If this can be done all digitally on the same stream (the hover functionality that you propose) that is even better.
[–]Tristal 5 points  ago (7|2)
If it will replace the spelling bee? Hell yes.
[–]winterbean 5 points  ago (6|1)
Honestly I don't think it'd be worth anybody's time, effort, or money to try to get M:tg on something like that right now. Something bigger would probably be better (League of Legends, DOTA2, Starcraft)
[–]thelok 5 points  ago (7|2)
I currently started watching streams and I would be interested in seeing MTG matches in higher quality broadcasts. Unfortunately I cancelled my cable TV so I would be able to watch online only.
You already mentioned being able to see the cards by hovering a mouse over it so I think it would be much more interesting in a interactive medium (e.g. internet/computer) than cable. That's what I do most of the time as a beginner, is look up cards if someone plays it. I am sort of annoyed by the crappy quality streams sometimes since I can't make out the cards or the names of cards.
I think the learning curve is pretty high for people that might just watch casually since there are so many cards out there -- so entry into non-interactable media such as cable would seem harder.
[–][deleted] 3 points  ago (4|1)
I would watch it. I already watch a lot of MTG Tournaments online and it would be nice to record and watch tournaments on TV as well. I don't know how well they would do on ESPN but maybe ESPN2 or another lesser known station. Like the "weird sports" network that shows international stuff maybe?
It would have to be on par or better than SCG coverage. I always thought they should do something like this on G4.
[–]vladthor 4 points  ago (7|3)
If G4 didn't suck and was old G4, maybe.
[–]Purple-Is-Delicious 4 points  ago (21|17)
WTF ESPN?! MTG?!, show some fucking HOCKEY.
(I like to play MTG, but it's a game and hobby, not a fucking sport)
[–]mysticrudnin 3 points  ago (7|4)
uh that hover thing sounds extremely awesome. high quality (beating twitch) would cause me to move to another service, yes.
[–]Daiches 3 points  ago (6|3)
In the words of Daniel Bryan: Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Etc! Etc! Except I'll only be able to see it when somebody puts it on YouTube..
[–]Merendino 1 point  ago (3|2)
It's how I feel too. Would be nice to get some professional level coverage of it, but I don't have cable, and probably never will. As such, I'd never get to see it. :(
[–]SleetTheFox 3 points  ago (3|0)
I think it'd be great, but it really would be important to have the board state clearly visible in one form or another. Two people sitting around a table isn't exciting; if you can't see the cards, there's only so much worth watching.
[–]thefifth5 3 points  ago (3|0)
Yes
[–]collinstrader 3 points  ago (3|0)
I would watch, as long as the commentators were knowledgeable, and the quality was clear. You could also have commercials for starcity or other large card sellers.
[–]puppetmaster2501 3 points  ago (4|1)
If there was like 1 huge tournament per year with a gigantic prize pool so a lot is on the line, and it just streamed live on twitch.tv, with very skilled commentators/casters who know the cards and can get us in the heads of the players, and the image was high quality and we could see the cards, then yeah me and half of the people I know would watch that.
[–]Confirmed to beAJSacher 3 points  ago (6|3)
I would love to discuss this with you. PMing you my e-mail address.